🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is seeking damages totaling $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a clear response from the Kremlin regarding proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a large loan to finance its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in EU countries shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal actions, including seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, if relevant assets can be identified," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting protections to shield EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the principal funds would remain unaffected.

Kyiv would solely be required to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative method for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

Such a proposal, however, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as aligned with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the reparations loan as "the strongest solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that when you do all this destruction to another nation, you have to pay for the rebuilding."