🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.